PSG Playbook

Last reviewed: April 2026

This playbook covers PSG as a core government support scheme and explains when it is a stronger option than non-grant pathways.

Who should apply and who should not

Best fit:

• SMEs with a clear operational problem and a pre-approved solution
• teams wanting a contained first-step digitalisation project

Poorer fit:

• projects requiring broad, multi-workstream transformation
• businesses that have materially started the project already

Typical support scope and co-funding logic

PSG is typically designed for approved solutions and equipment with reimbursement-based support logic. Internal cash-flow planning still matters.

Compare with alternative pathways

Choose PSG over alternatives when:

• scope is clearly defined and operational
• compliance discipline is manageable
• grant reimbursement timing is acceptable

Consider alternatives when:

• you need rapid deployment capital
• your project is exploratory and pilot-led
• you need programme-based capability support

Important note

Note: PSG is strongest when the case is specific, proportionate, and operationally grounded.

Next step

Continue to EDG Playbook.